Climate Change Is A Hoax!

climate change is not a “pollution” issue.

Introduction

“The world is going to end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change” Says Thunberg in her new book. “Around 2030 we will be in a position to set off an irreversible chain reaction beyond human control that will lead to the end of our civilization as we know it.” A debate on the real reasons around the climate change and the global warming previously took place. Some people claim that global warming and climate change takes place due to human activity, and some others believe that it has nothing to do with human activity. Scientists themselves make apocalyptic claims. “It’s difficult to see how we could accommodate a billion people or even half of that,” if Earth warms four degrees, said one earlier this year. “The potential for multi-breadbasket failure is increasing,” said another. If sea levels rise as much as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts, another scientist said, “It will be an unmanageable problem” (Shellenberger, 2019). The global warming that caused climate change took place naturally on Earth and it is not harmful as some people think, but others believe it is a human activity cause which is not true due to the scientific mechanisms of the atmospheric greenhouse effect  

First, climate change is not a “pollution” issue. In spite of the fact that the US Supreme Court decided in 2007 that the greenhouse gasses were lawfully an air poison, in other words, they are something totally different. The decrease of greenhouse gasses isn’t equivalent to the decrease of sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, or particulates. These types of pollution are man-made, they might harm, and they are the unintended waste products of industrial creation. In a perfect world, we might want to stop their production through the preparation of technical and economic resources. In any case, the greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide, is both regular and man-made. It was never harmful; it is a natural system and this is a natural part of it, and people do not wish to eliminate its production. It was never a serious harmful problem to be solved or a toxic gas; it is a completely endemic part of the society and who we are.  To a huge degree, it is an exceptionally attractive yield, as it relates with our way of life. Greenhouse gas emissions rise with a rise in a nation’s wealth, something all people want. To reduce carbon dioxide requires an alteration in nearly every facet of the economy, and therefore nearly every facet of our culture. To recognize greenhouse gases as a problem requires us to change a great deal about how we view the world and ourselves within it. And that leads to the second distinction ( Hoffman , 2012).

 It is true that climate has changed for natural reasons, mainly due to variations in the Earth’s orbit; but usually it happens slowly over thousands of years so animals and even early humans had a chance to evolve and adapt. “Another problem with natural cycles is that people look at too small a sample size,” says Mike. “A cold winter in the USA doesn’t disproveclimate change. Did you check to see how hot it was in Asia at the same time? We need to look globally and for longer than the last couple years we remember”

Refutation

The opposing claim believe that the current warming trend is of particular significance because most of it is extremely likely (greater than 95 percent probability) to be the result of human activity since the mid-20th century and proceeding at a rate that is unprecedented over decades to millennia and the increase in the greenhouse gasses is also a result of human activity (Global climate change, 2019). On the other hand, the basic mechanisms of the atmospheric ‘greenhouse effect’ are:

  1. sunlight passes through the atmosphere and heats the Earth’s surface;
  2. the heated surface then cools by emitting infrared radiation into the atmosphere;
  3. Most of this radiation is absorbed by greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, some of which is re-radiated back towards the ground and some into space ( Damerell, Munroe, & Johnson, 2016).

Conclusion 

To sum up, The a dangerous atmospheric devotion that caused environmental change occurred normally on Earth, and it isn’t destructive as certain individuals might suspect; however, others think it is a human action cause which isn’t valid because of the logical systems of the greenhouse gas mechanism. 

Amira Azab

191417

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started